<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en-gb">
<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://theeyetribe.com/forum/feed.php?f=8" />

<title>The Eye Tribe</title>
<subtitle>Developer Forum</subtitle>
<link href="http://theeyetribe.com/forum/index.php" />
<updated>2016-11-25T12:16:20+02:00</updated>

<author><name><![CDATA[The Eye Tribe]]></name></author>
<id>http://theeyetribe.com/forum/feed.php?f=8</id>
<entry>
<author><name><![CDATA[qx7711]]></name></author>
<updated>2016-11-25T12:16:20+02:00</updated>
<published>2016-11-25T12:16:20+02:00</published>
<id>http://theeyetribe.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=648&amp;p=2681#p2681</id>
<link href="http://theeyetribe.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=648&amp;p=2681#p2681"/>
<title type="html"><![CDATA[General Discussion • Jumpy pupil diameter]]></title>

<category term="General Discussion" scheme="http://theeyetribe.com/forum/viewforum.php?f=8" label="General Discussion"/>
<content type="html" xml:base="http://theeyetribe.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=648&amp;p=2681#p2681"><![CDATA[
Recently I discovered that the pupil diameter signal can contain artificial &quot;jumps&quot; which are well above the noise level. I guess that these &quot;jumps&quot; are caused by adaptive processes in the camera (automatic exposure control) and/or the eyetracking algorithm (adaptive threshold for pupil edge detection). The amplitude of the jumps seems to be very similar in one recording but can be different across recordings (different subjects, different conditions). The amplitude of these &quot;jumps&quot;, I guess, depends on different individual pupil-to-iris contrasts and different levels of focus (also depending on glasses vs. contact lenses vs. no correction, even at the same eye-to-camera distance).<br />Obviously, having the exposure and threshold controlled adaptively is a good thing, but I wonder if we could have a &quot;tracker&quot; attribute in the API which allows us to freeze/unfreeze the currently used exposure level and threshold in order to get an artifact-free pupil diameter signal when this signal is of particular interest.<br /><br /><a href="https://postimg.org/image/565y3sgkt/" class="postlink"><img src="https://s22.postimg.org/fszr97oq9/TET_Pup_Dia_60_Hz_0_9_77.png" alt="Image" /></a>.   <br />Pupil diameter of one eye over time. X:500ms/div, Y:2.5pix/div (where &quot;pix&quot; is the unit of &quot;psize&quot; as returned by the TET API).<p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="http://theeyetribe.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=4906">skataqx7711</a> — 25 Nov 2016, 12:16</p><hr />
]]></content>
</entry>
<entry>
<author><name><![CDATA[ajith.murugaian@gmail.com]]></name></author>
<updated>2016-11-06T14:38:41+02:00</updated>
<published>2016-11-06T14:38:41+02:00</published>
<id>http://theeyetribe.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=633&amp;p=2669#p2669</id>
<link href="http://theeyetribe.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=633&amp;p=2669#p2669"/>
<title type="html"><![CDATA[General Discussion • Re: Eye Tribe Pro Release Date]]></title>

<category term="General Discussion" scheme="http://theeyetribe.com/forum/viewforum.php?f=8" label="General Discussion"/>
<content type="html" xml:base="http://theeyetribe.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=633&amp;p=2669#p2669"><![CDATA[
I am planning to do a project using the device in december. Did any of you guys get your device? <img src="http://theeyetribe.com/forum/images/smilies/icon_e_sad.gif" alt=":-(" title="Sad" /><p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="http://theeyetribe.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=12856">skataajith.murugaian@gmail.com</a> — 06 Nov 2016, 14:38</p><hr />
]]></content>
</entry>
<entry>
<author><name><![CDATA[kimarionizetha@gmail.com]]></name></author>
<updated>2016-10-24T11:26:32+02:00</updated>
<published>2016-10-24T11:26:32+02:00</published>
<id>http://theeyetribe.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=640&amp;p=2645#p2645</id>
<link href="http://theeyetribe.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=640&amp;p=2645#p2645"/>
<title type="html"><![CDATA[General Discussion • Eye Tribe Connected but not working]]></title>

<category term="General Discussion" scheme="http://theeyetribe.com/forum/viewforum.php?f=8" label="General Discussion"/>
<content type="html" xml:base="http://theeyetribe.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=640&amp;p=2645#p2645"><![CDATA[
Hi everyone, I am using eye tribe but suddenly can not detected. It gives a message that your device has been connected but not working.  Anyone who have an idea on how to resolve this problem, Actually, This is the second device I experienced the same problem. Maybe the Eye Tribe Company should reconsider this, the device is quite cheap but not durable at all. Its annoying, in the middle of experiment the device just  stop working suddenly!! #feelingconfused<p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="http://theeyetribe.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=6457">skatakimarionizetha@gmail.com</a> — 24 Oct 2016, 11:26</p><hr />
]]></content>
</entry>
<entry>
<author><name><![CDATA[mattfeusner@yahoo.com]]></name></author>
<updated>2016-10-21T06:13:01+02:00</updated>
<published>2016-10-21T06:13:01+02:00</published>
<id>http://theeyetribe.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=633&amp;p=2642#p2642</id>
<link href="http://theeyetribe.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=633&amp;p=2642#p2642"/>
<title type="html"><![CDATA[General Discussion • Re: Eye Tribe Pro Release Date]]></title>

<category term="General Discussion" scheme="http://theeyetribe.com/forum/viewforum.php?f=8" label="General Discussion"/>
<content type="html" xml:base="http://theeyetribe.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=633&amp;p=2642#p2642"><![CDATA[
+1 Tried the contact form but haven't heard anything. Waiting 8+ months now, how about you?<p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="http://theeyetribe.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=11153">skatamattfeusner@yahoo.com</a> — 21 Oct 2016, 06:13</p><hr />
]]></content>
</entry>
<entry>
<author><name><![CDATA[venusudha13]]></name></author>
<updated>2016-10-20T07:00:52+02:00</updated>
<published>2016-10-20T07:00:52+02:00</published>
<id>http://theeyetribe.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=637&amp;p=2640#p2640</id>
<link href="http://theeyetribe.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=637&amp;p=2640#p2640"/>
<title type="html"><![CDATA[General Discussion • Scan path]]></title>

<category term="General Discussion" scheme="http://theeyetribe.com/forum/viewforum.php?f=8" label="General Discussion"/>
<content type="html" xml:base="http://theeyetribe.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=637&amp;p=2640#p2640"><![CDATA[
hii, can you help me to find scan path or fixation points from gaze coordinates, I am using the eye tribe to monitor a game environment.<p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="http://theeyetribe.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=12302">skatavenusudha13</a> — 20 Oct 2016, 07:00</p><hr />
]]></content>
</entry>
<entry>
<author><name><![CDATA[Olivier]]></name></author>
<updated>2016-09-29T11:10:22+02:00</updated>
<published>2016-09-29T11:10:22+02:00</published>
<id>http://theeyetribe.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=633&amp;p=2633#p2633</id>
<link href="http://theeyetribe.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=633&amp;p=2633#p2633"/>
<title type="html"><![CDATA[General Discussion • Re: Eye Tribe Pro Release Date]]></title>

<category term="General Discussion" scheme="http://theeyetribe.com/forum/viewforum.php?f=8" label="General Discussion"/>
<content type="html" xml:base="http://theeyetribe.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=633&amp;p=2633#p2633"><![CDATA[
Same question here !<p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="http://theeyetribe.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=12624">skataOlivier</a> — 29 Sep 2016, 11:10</p><hr />
]]></content>
</entry>
<entry>
<author><name><![CDATA[Francis.Jambon@imag.fr]]></name></author>
<updated>2016-09-28T10:26:10+02:00</updated>
<published>2016-09-28T10:26:10+02:00</published>
<id>http://theeyetribe.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=633&amp;p=2632#p2632</id>
<link href="http://theeyetribe.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=633&amp;p=2632#p2632"/>
<title type="html"><![CDATA[General Discussion • Re: Eye Tribe Pro Release Date]]></title>

<category term="General Discussion" scheme="http://theeyetribe.com/forum/viewforum.php?f=8" label="General Discussion"/>
<content type="html" xml:base="http://theeyetribe.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=633&amp;p=2632#p2632"><![CDATA[
Hi,<br />I have a similar question: I have planned some experiments late 2016 / early 2017, and I wonder if the new device will be available at that time?<br />Sincerely,<br />Francis<p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="http://theeyetribe.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=1863">skataFrancis.Jambon@imag.fr</a> — 28 Sep 2016, 10:26</p><hr />
]]></content>
</entry>
<entry>
<author><name><![CDATA[Emrah]]></name></author>
<updated>2016-09-23T15:36:53+02:00</updated>
<published>2016-09-23T15:36:53+02:00</published>
<id>http://theeyetribe.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=633&amp;p=2630#p2630</id>
<link href="http://theeyetribe.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=633&amp;p=2630#p2630"/>
<title type="html"><![CDATA[General Discussion • Eye Tribe Pro Release Date]]></title>

<category term="General Discussion" scheme="http://theeyetribe.com/forum/viewforum.php?f=8" label="General Discussion"/>
<content type="html" xml:base="http://theeyetribe.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=633&amp;p=2630#p2630"><![CDATA[
Hi,<br />Could you give some information about Eye Tribe Pro release date ? <br /><br />We ordered on may but still we don't know the release date.<br /><br />Could you explain the delay problem ?<br /><br />Regards,<br /><br />Emrah<p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="http://theeyetribe.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=1629">skataEmrah</a> — 23 Sep 2016, 15:36</p><hr />
]]></content>
</entry>
<entry>
<author><name><![CDATA[goncagmen]]></name></author>
<updated>2016-09-18T11:37:38+02:00</updated>
<published>2016-09-18T11:37:38+02:00</published>
<id>http://theeyetribe.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=571&amp;p=2626#p2626</id>
<link href="http://theeyetribe.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=571&amp;p=2626#p2626"/>
<title type="html"><![CDATA[General Discussion • Re: Pupil Diameter]]></title>

<category term="General Discussion" scheme="http://theeyetribe.com/forum/viewforum.php?f=8" label="General Discussion"/>
<content type="html" xml:base="http://theeyetribe.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=571&amp;p=2626#p2626"><![CDATA[
Hi,<br /><br />I have a question about pupil size. I have read from the forum that pupil sizes are recorded as pixel by Eye Tribe eye tracker.<br />But, I want to convert it to mm. <br />For the conversion is it enough to multiply pixel value by 0.264583 ? (because of 1 px = 0.264583 mm). <br />Or, is there another formula for calculation, if the person is 70 cm far from eye tracker and monitor.<br /><br />Can you please help,<br />Many Thanks.<p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="http://theeyetribe.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=12485">skatagoncagmen</a> — 18 Sep 2016, 11:37</p><hr />
]]></content>
</entry>
<entry>
<author><name><![CDATA[t.hofmann@hs-osnabrueck.de]]></name></author>
<updated>2016-09-12T13:25:04+02:00</updated>
<published>2016-09-12T13:25:04+02:00</published>
<id>http://theeyetribe.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=631&amp;p=2624#p2624</id>
<link href="http://theeyetribe.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=631&amp;p=2624#p2624"/>
<title type="html"><![CDATA[General Discussion • Position of tracker in car]]></title>

<category term="General Discussion" scheme="http://theeyetribe.com/forum/viewforum.php?f=8" label="General Discussion"/>
<content type="html" xml:base="http://theeyetribe.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=631&amp;p=2624#p2624"><![CDATA[
Hi,<br /><br />we are working on a science project about eyetracking in the cockpit of a car to enhance the user experience.<br />The test person is sitting on the driver seat and looking at the display in center console of the cockpit, behind the gear shift lever. So far we were only able to place the eyetracker below the display to get a working calibration.<br /><br />Is there any way to put the tracker above the display and still get it calibrated?<p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="http://theeyetribe.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=6473">skatat.hofmann@hs-osnabrueck.de</a> — 12 Sep 2016, 13:25</p><hr />
]]></content>
</entry>
<entry>
<author><name><![CDATA[bigpepperlo@gmail.com]]></name></author>
<updated>2016-09-10T09:44:11+02:00</updated>
<published>2016-09-10T09:44:11+02:00</published>
<id>http://theeyetribe.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=546&amp;p=2621#p2621</id>
<link href="http://theeyetribe.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=546&amp;p=2621#p2621"/>
<title type="html"><![CDATA[General Discussion • Re: pupil size]]></title>

<category term="General Discussion" scheme="http://theeyetribe.com/forum/viewforum.php?f=8" label="General Discussion"/>
<content type="html" xml:base="http://theeyetribe.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=546&amp;p=2621#p2621"><![CDATA[
pupil size- returned through pixels the matrix capturecamera / used <!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="https://www.leopardimaging.com/USB_3_3.html/">https://www.leopardimaging.com/USB_3_3.html/</a><!-- m --><p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="http://theeyetribe.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=6419">skatabigpepperlo@gmail.com</a> — 10 Sep 2016, 09:44</p><hr />
]]></content>
</entry>
<entry>
<author><name><![CDATA[goncagmen]]></name></author>
<updated>2016-09-09T14:26:58+02:00</updated>
<published>2016-09-09T14:26:58+02:00</published>
<id>http://theeyetribe.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=546&amp;p=2620#p2620</id>
<link href="http://theeyetribe.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=546&amp;p=2620#p2620"/>
<title type="html"><![CDATA[General Discussion • pupil size]]></title>

<category term="General Discussion" scheme="http://theeyetribe.com/forum/viewforum.php?f=8" label="General Discussion"/>
<content type="html" xml:base="http://theeyetribe.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=546&amp;p=2620#p2620"><![CDATA[
Hi,<br /><br />I have a question about pupil size. I have read from the forum that pupil sizes are recorded as pixel.<br />But, I want to convert it to mm. <br />For the conversion is it enough to multiply it by 0.264583 ? (1 px = 0.264583 mm). <br />Or, is there another formula for calculation, if the person is 70 cm far from eye tracker and monitor.<br /><br />Can you please help,<br />Many Thanks.<p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="http://theeyetribe.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=12485">skatagoncagmen</a> — 09 Sep 2016, 14:26</p><hr />
]]></content>
</entry>
<entry>
<author><name><![CDATA[JeffKang]]></name></author>
<updated>2016-08-07T22:59:40+02:00</updated>
<published>2016-08-07T22:59:40+02:00</published>
<id>http://theeyetribe.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=626&amp;p=2608#p2608</id>
<link href="http://theeyetribe.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=626&amp;p=2608#p2608"/>
<title type="html"><![CDATA[General Discussion • Going from 9 to 16 calibration points stops jittery tracking]]></title>

<category term="General Discussion" scheme="http://theeyetribe.com/forum/viewforum.php?f=8" label="General Discussion"/>
<content type="html" xml:base="http://theeyetribe.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=626&amp;p=2608#p2608"><![CDATA[
A couple days ago, I was noticing that the tracking was getting a bit spotty.<br /><br />I then noticed that I had my calibration points set at 9.<br /><br />I usually have it at the maximum points, but during some time, it was reset.<br /><br />It's possible that the tracking recovery is coincidental, and 9 points is usually adequate.<br /><br />I wonder what would happen if you could use more points, but I'm guessing that there are diminishing returns.<p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="http://theeyetribe.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=2379">skataJeffKang</a> — 07 Aug 2016, 22:59</p><hr />
]]></content>
</entry>
<entry>
<author><name><![CDATA[kimarionizetha@gmail.com]]></name></author>
<updated>2016-07-25T06:21:54+02:00</updated>
<published>2016-07-25T06:21:54+02:00</published>
<id>http://theeyetribe.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=593&amp;p=2601#p2601</id>
<link href="http://theeyetribe.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=593&amp;p=2601#p2601"/>
<title type="html"><![CDATA[General Discussion • Re: .net framework]]></title>

<category term="General Discussion" scheme="http://theeyetribe.com/forum/viewforum.php?f=8" label="General Discussion"/>
<content type="html" xml:base="http://theeyetribe.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=593&amp;p=2601#p2601"><![CDATA[
I also have the same problem. I am using c#,  I downloaded a sample code from Github and i tried to run it  in visual studio environment, of course i have already installed .net framework 3.5 as they recommended in the website but when i run the sample code i found out that some library is missing. any way with an idea on how to solve this problem  please  <img src="http://theeyetribe.com/forum/images/smilies/icon_neutral.gif" alt=":|" title="Neutral" /><p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="http://theeyetribe.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=6457">skatakimarionizetha@gmail.com</a> — 25 Jul 2016, 06:21</p><hr />
]]></content>
</entry>
<entry>
<author><name><![CDATA[Cheveoner]]></name></author>
<updated>2016-07-22T10:56:20+02:00</updated>
<published>2016-07-22T10:56:20+02:00</published>
<id>http://theeyetribe.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=576&amp;p=2599#p2599</id>
<link href="http://theeyetribe.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=576&amp;p=2599#p2599"/>
<title type="html"><![CDATA[General Discussion • Re: Eyetribe - Head Movements]]></title>

<category term="General Discussion" scheme="http://theeyetribe.com/forum/viewforum.php?f=8" label="General Discussion"/>
<content type="html" xml:base="http://theeyetribe.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=576&amp;p=2599#p2599"><![CDATA[
<blockquote><div><cite>Martin wrote:</cite><br />Hi DP,<br /><br />The first development-kit device does not account for head movements along the Z-axis (depth) from the device.  <br /><br />We know that's been a big limitation so we've worked hard on it over the last two years. New device resolves this issue. Other improvements for the new device is larger screens (up to 27&quot;), higher frame-rate (+75), pupil size in millimeters, and more robust USB connectivity.<br /></div></blockquote><br /><br />Hi Martin,<br /><br />Is there any visual comparison available to see the effectiveness of the new head compensation? We are trying to implement our own, but it may be worth to give the 2nd gen evaluation kit a go, depending on the improved accuracy.<p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="http://theeyetribe.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=7382">skataCheveoner</a> — 22 Jul 2016, 10:56</p><hr />
]]></content>
</entry>
</feed>